Google Pixel 9a vs Vivo X300 Ultra

76 out 100

VS

94 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9a Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Vivo X300 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9a

Lighter design: 186g vs 232g
Built-in eSIM

Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Ultra

Larger display: 6.82in
Higher pixel density: 510ppi
Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
Higher battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5100mAh
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Supports Dolby Atmos
Infrared port
Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Google Pixel 9a and Vivo X300 Ultra

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Google Pixel 9a

91

Vivo X300 Ultra

98

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Google Pixel 9a

84

Vivo X300 Ultra

94

Performance

App & system performance

Google Pixel 9a

59

Vivo X300 Ultra

99

Games

3D gaming performance

Google Pixel 9a

57

Vivo X300 Ultra

96

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Google Pixel 9a

75

Vivo X300 Ultra

93

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Google Pixel 9a

85

Vivo X300 Ultra

90

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Google Pixel 9a

76

Vivo X300 Ultra

94

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	POLED	AMOLED
Size	6.3 in	6.82 in
Resolution	1080x2424 pixels	1440x3168 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	19.8:9
Pixel density	422 ppi	510 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes (60-120 Hz)	Yes
Max brightness	2700 nits	1800 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen-to-body ratio	84.5 %	90.3 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	154.7 mm (6.09 in)	162.98 mm (6.42 in)
Width	73.3 mm (2.89 in)	76.81 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness	8.9 mm (0.35 in)	8.49 mm (0.33 in)
Weight	186 g (6.56 oz)	232 g (8.18 oz)
Water resistance	IP68	IP69
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Plastic	Glass
Frame	Metal	Metal
Colors	- White - Black - Red - Purple	- Black - Silver - Green
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Google Pixel 9a

84.5 %

Vivo X300 Ultra

90.3 %

Performance

Testing Google Pixel 9a and Vivo X300 Ultra In benchmarks

Chipset	Google Tensor G4	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency	3100 MHz	4600 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (2 + 6)
Architecture	- 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4)	- 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)
Process	Samsung	TSMC
Transistor Size	4 nm	3 nm
Neural Processor	Yes	Hexagon
Graphics	Mali-G715 MP7	n/a
GPU Cores	896	n/a
GPU Frequency	940 MHz	n/a
FLOPS	1792 GFLOPS	n/a

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Google Pixel 9a

1677

Vivo X300 Ultra

3621

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Google Pixel 9a

4067

Vivo X300 Ultra

10653

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	1677	3621
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	4067	10653
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	7784	n/a

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Google Pixel 9a], [Vivo X300 Ultra]

AnTuTu 10

Google Pixel 9a

991079

Vivo X300 Ultra

4247433

CPU	161737	1192014
GPU	464865	1543938
Memory	191750	525105
UX	172727	986376
NanoReview Score	991079	4247433

Memory

RAM Size	8 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	4200 MHz	5333 MHz
Channels	4	4

Storage Capacity	- 128 GB - 256 GB	256 GB
Storage Type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.1
Memory Card	No	No

Software

OS	Android 15	Android 16
UI Skin	Stock Android	OriginOS 6

Battery

Volume	5100 mAh	6600 mAh
Max Charging Power	23 W	100 W
Battery Type	Li-Po	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	Yes (7.5 W)	Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging	n/a	Yes
Fast Charging	Yes (50% in 30 min)	Yes

Main camera

Matrix	48 MP	200 MP
Photo resolution	8000x6000 pixels	n/a
Zoom	Digital	Optical, 3.7x
Flash	Dual LED	Dual LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (1080p)	240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens	120 °	116 °
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP	Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support

Matrix	50 MP	200 MP
Aperture	f/1.7	f/1.9
Focal length	25 mm	35 mm
Sensor	n/a	Sony LYT-901
Sensor size	1/1.2	1/1.12 (0.89)
Pixel size	0.8 μm	0.7 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)	Laser autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	n/a	200 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.7
Focal length	n/a	85 mm
Sensor	n/a	Samsung ISOCELL HPB
Sensor size	n/a	1/1.4 (0.71)
Pixel size	n/a	0.56 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Matrix	13 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	14 mm
Sensor	n/a	Sony LYT-818
Sensor size	1/3.1	1/1.28 (0.78)
Pixel size	n/a	1.22 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Optical

Front camera

Matrix	13 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	4032x3024 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.5
Focal length	20 mm	24 mm
Sensor	CMOS	Samsung ISOCELL JN1
Sensor size	1/3.1	1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size	1.12 μm	0.64 μm
Autofocus	n/a	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.3	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	3.2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	Yes	Yes
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared Port	No	Yes

SIM Count*	1	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	n/a	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	Yes	No
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)	n/a
3G Bands	UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19	n/a
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B41/B48/B66/B71)	n/a
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	n/a
3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	No	Yes

Other

Class	Mid-range	Flagship
Announced	March, 2025 yr	March, 2026 yr
Release Date	April, 2025 yr	April, 2026 yr
Launch Price ($)	499	n/a
MSRP ($)	n/a	1199
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	No	Yes, 80 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Google Pixel 9a

0 (0%)

Vivo X300 Ultra

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Google Pixel 9a vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments