Google Pixel 9a vs Xiaomi 18 Fold
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9a Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Xiaomi 18 Fold, Manufactured in September, 2026 with chipsetXRing O3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9a
- Higher pixel density: 422ppi
- Lighter design: 186g vs 219g
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 18 Fold
- Larger display: 7.58in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5100mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | POLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 in | 7.58 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2424 pixels | 2364x1672 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 3:2 |
| Pixel density | 422 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2700 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5 % | 88.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 154.7 mm (6.09 in) | 163.8 mm (6.45 in) |
| Width | 73.3 mm (2.89 in) | 117.8 mm (4.64 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 5.02 mm (0.2 in) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP59 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Red - Purple |
- Silver - Gray - Red - Rose Gold |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | XRing O3 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 4350 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 10 (2 + 4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/3.15 (C1-Pro) - 4/3.68 (C1-Premium) - 2/4.35 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G715 MP7 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 896 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1792 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1677 | 3636 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4067 | 13491 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 7784 | n/a |
| CPU | 161737 | 1359147 |
| GPU | 464865 | 2143582 |
| Memory | 191750 | 941063 |
| UX | 172727 | 784222 |
| NanoReview Score | 991079 | 5228014 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | HyperOS 4 |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 23 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (7.5 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | n/a |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | n/a |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | n/a |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.2 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.5 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 80 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV50M |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4032x3024 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | n/a |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | GSM B2 / B3 / B5 / B8 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA B1 / B2 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B41/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 499 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1640 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 18 Fold the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0