Google Pixel 9a vs Xiaomi Mi 11
Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9a Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Xiaomi Mi 11, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9a
- Lighter design: 186g vs 196g
- Higher battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 4600mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 11
- Larger display: 6.81in
- Higher pixel density: 515ppi
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | POLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.3 in | 6.81 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2424 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 422 ppi | 515 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 2700 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.5 % | 91.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 154.7 mm (6.09 in) | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 73.3 mm (2.89 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Red - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G715 MP7 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU Cores | 896 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1792 GFLOPS | 1290.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1677 | 1426 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4067 | 3840 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 7784 | n/a |
| CPU | 161737 | 224221 |
| GPU | 464865 | 292912 |
| Memory | 191750 | 185743 |
| UX | 172727 | 216361 |
| NanoReview Score | 991079 | 919237 |
| Stability | n/a | 91 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 30 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 5029 |
| Writing score | n/a | 15023 |
| Web score | n/a | 11478 |
| Video editing | n/a | 7618 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 9700 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 12956 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| UI Skin | Stock Android | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5100 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 23 W | 55 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (7.5 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes (83% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:50 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 05:56 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 10:13 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:26 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 99 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 48 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8000x6000 pixels | 12032x9204 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Macro: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung Bright S5KHMX |
| Sensor size | 1/1.2 | 1/1.33 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV13B10 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4032x3024 pixels | 5380x3620 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.3 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B41/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | December, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 499 | 750 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 9a the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0