Google Pixel 9a vs Xiaomi Redmi K80

76 out 100

VS

86 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Google Pixel 9a Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.3 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G4, vs Xiaomi Redmi K80, Manufactured in November, 2024with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Google Pixel 9a

Lighter design: 186g vs 206g
Supports DisplayPort
Built-in eSIM

Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K80

Larger display: 6.67in
Higher pixel density: 526ppi
Higher battery capacity: 6550mAh vs 5100mAh
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Infrared port
Includes charger

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Google Pixel 9a and Xiaomi Redmi K80

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Google Pixel 9a

91

Xiaomi Redmi K80

98

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Google Pixel 9a

84

Xiaomi Redmi K80

73

Performance

App & system performance

Google Pixel 9a

59

Xiaomi Redmi K80

85

Games

3D gaming performance

Google Pixel 9a

57

Xiaomi Redmi K80

89

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Google Pixel 9a

75

Xiaomi Redmi K80

98

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Google Pixel 9a

85

Xiaomi Redmi K80

82

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Google Pixel 9a

76

Xiaomi Redmi K80

86

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	POLED	AMOLED
Size	6.3 in	6.67 in
Resolution	1080x2424 pixels	1440x3200 pixels
Aspect ratio	20:9	20:9
Pixel density	422 ppi	526 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes (60-120 Hz)	Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness	2700 nits	1800 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate	n/a	480 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio	84.5 %	89.4 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	154.7 mm (6.09 in)	160.26 mm (6.31 in)
Width	73.3 mm (2.89 in)	74.95 mm (2.95 in)
Thickness	8.9 mm (0.35 in)	8.12 mm (0.32 in)
Weight	186 g (6.56 oz)	206 g (7.27 oz)
Water resistance	IP68	IP68
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Plastic	n/a
Frame	Metal	Metal
Colors	- White - Black - Red - Purple	- White - Black - Green
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Google Pixel 9a

84.5 %

Xiaomi Redmi K80

89.4 %

Performance

Testing Google Pixel 9a and Xiaomi Redmi K80 In benchmarks

Chipset	Google Tensor G4	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Max Frequency	3100 MHz	3300 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (1 + 3 + 4)	8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture	- 4/1.92 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.1 (Cortex-X4)	- 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
Process	Samsung	TSMC
Transistor Size	4 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Yes	Hexagon
Graphics	Mali-G715 MP7	Adreno 750
GPU Cores	896	1536
GPU Frequency	940 MHz	903-1000 MHz
FLOPS	1792 GFLOPS	2774 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Google Pixel 9a

1677

Xiaomi Redmi K80

2180

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Google Pixel 9a

4067

Xiaomi Redmi K80

7102

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	1677	2180
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	4067	7102
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	7784	n/a

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Google Pixel 9a]

AnTuTu 10

Google Pixel 9a

991079

Xiaomi Redmi K80

2021365

CPU	161737	431878
GPU	464865	820702
Memory	191750	351950
UX	172727	416835
NanoReview Score	991079	2021365

3DMark Wild Life

Google Pixel 9a

n/a

Xiaomi Redmi K80

14874

Stability	n/a	73 %
Graphics Test	n/a	88 fps
Graphics Score	n/a	14874

Sources: 3DMark [Xiaomi Redmi K80]

PCMark 3.0

Google Pixel 9a

n/a

Xiaomi Redmi K80

18047

Writing score	n/a	21283
Web score	n/a	17939
Video editing	n/a	7758
Data manipulation	n/a	17477
NanoReview Score	n/a	18047

Memory

RAM Size	8 GB	- 12 GB - 16 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	4200 MHz	4200 MHz
Channels	4	2

Storage Capacity	- 128 GB - 256 GB	- 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB
Storage Type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory Card	No	No

Software

OS	Android 15	Android 15
UI Skin	Stock Android	HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume	5100 mAh	6550 mAh
Max Charging Power	23 W	90 W
Battery Type	Li-Po	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	Yes (7.5 W)	No
Fast Charging	Yes (50% in 30 min)	Yes

Main camera

Matrix	48 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	8000x6000 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Digital
Flash	Dual LED	LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	Up to 24FPS
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (1080p)	1920 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens	120 °	n/a
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.7	f/1.6
Focal length	25 mm	24 mm
Sensor	n/a	OmniVision OVX8000
Sensor size	1/1.2	1/1.55
Pixel size	0.8 μm	1 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)	Phase autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	13 MP	8 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Sensor	n/a	Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size	1/3.1	1/4
Pixel size	n/a	1.12 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	13 MP	20 MP
Photo resolution	4032x3024 pixels	n/a
Aperture	f/2.2	n/a
Focal length	20 mm	n/a
Sensor	CMOS	Omnivision OV20B
Sensor size	1/3.1	n/a
Pixel size	1.12 μm	n/a
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 30 fps	1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.3	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	3.2	n/a
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	Yes	n/a
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared Port	No	Yes

SIM Count*	1	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	n/a	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	Yes	No
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)	GSM B3/B5/B8
3G Bands	UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19	WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B41/B48/B66/B71)	LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	No	n/a

Other

Class	Mid-range	Mid-range
Announced	March, 2025 yr	November, 2024 yr
Release Date	April, 2025 yr	November, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($)	499	429
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	No	Yes 90 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K80 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Google Pixel 9a

0 (0%)

Xiaomi Redmi K80

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Google Pixel 9a vs Xiaomi Redmi K80

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments