Honor 200 Smart vs Honor 90 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 200 Smart Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.8 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, vs Honor 90 Lite, Manufactured in June, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 200 Smart
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 4500mAh
Reasons to choose Honor 90 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 391ppi
- Lighter design: 179g vs 193g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1080x2388 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.9:9 |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 391 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 850 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.1 % | 89.6 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.9 mm (6.57 in) | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) | 7.48 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Green |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 |
| Max Frequency | 1950 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 192 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 955 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 244.5 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 920 | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2130 | 1927 |
| CPU | 154989 | 135029 |
| GPU | 50152 | 62888 |
| Memory | 154971 | 103707 |
| UX | 108408 | 101222 |
| NanoReview Score | 468520 | 402846 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 8.0 | MagicOS 7.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:52 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 100 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 11584x8688 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 100 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 100 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | June, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 199 | 300 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | Yes 35 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 200 Smart the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0