Home Phone comparison Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 11 F 5G - Which is better?

Honor 200 vs Oppo Reno 11 F 5G

71 out 100
Honor 200
VS
59 out 100
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
Honor 200
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 200 Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Oppo Reno 11 F 5G, Manufactured in February, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor 200
  • Higher pixel density: 436ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
  • Lighter design: 177g vs 187g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Honor 200
vs
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED OLED
Size 6.7 in 6.7 in
Resolution 1200x2664 pixels 1080x2412 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.98:9 20:9
Pixel density 436 ppi 394 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness 4000 nits 1100 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90 % 89.7 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 161.5 mm (6.36 in) 161.6 mm (6.36 in)
Width 74.6 mm (2.94 in) 74.7 mm (2.94 in)
Thickness 7.7 mm (0.3 in) 7.54 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 177 g (6.24 oz)
Water resistance No IP65
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - White
- Green
- Pink		 - Blue
- Green
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor 200
90 %
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
89.7 %

Performance

Testing Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 11 F 5G In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
Max Frequency 2630 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 550
Graphics Adreno 720 Mali-G68 MP4
GPU Cores 512 256
GPU Frequency 975 MHz 800 MHz
FLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS 686 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Honor 200
1147
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
899
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Honor 200
3398
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
2345
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1147899
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)33982345
Geekbench Compute (GPU)35922394
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor 200], [Oppo Reno 11 F 5G]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Honor 200
790835
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
601969
CPU238342162422
GPU267714118993
Memory133169162129
UX151610158425
NanoReview Score790835601969

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB
- 16 GB		 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) Android 14
UI Skin MagicOS 9.0 ColorOS 14

Battery

Volume 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 67 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 19 min)
Full Charge Time 0:45 h 0:45 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 64 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 480 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 112 ° 112 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP		 Standard: 64 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP64 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/1.7
Focal lengthn/a25 mm
SensorSony IMX906Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size1/1.561/2.0
Pixel size1 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.4n/a
SensorSony IMX856n/a
Sensor size1/1.3n/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix12 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Focal lengthn/a16 mm
Sensorn/aSony IMX355
Sensor sizen/a1/4.0
Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital
Main camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Honor 200
133
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
n/a
Video quality
Honor 200
121
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
n/a
Overall camera score
Honor 200
130
Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
n/a
Bokeh65n/a
Preview61n/a
Zoom124n/a
Sources: DxOMark [Honor 200]

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 6528x3680 pixels
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.4
Focal length n/a 22 mm
Sensor CMOS Sony IMX709
Sensor size n/a 1/2.74
Pixel size n/a 0.8 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66)
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May, 2024 yr February, 2024 yr
Release Date May, 2024 yr February, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 499 299
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 100 W Yes 67 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 200 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below