Home Phone comparison Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 14 Pro - Which is better?

Honor 200 vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro

71 out 100
Honor 200
VS
82 out 100
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Honor 200
Oppo Reno 14 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 200 Manufactured in May, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8450. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor 200
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 201g
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 14 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.83in
  • Higher pixel density: 450ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 5200mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Honor 200
vs
Oppo Reno 14 Pro

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.7 in 6.83 in
Resolution 1200x2664 pixels 1272x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.98:9 n/a
Pixel density 436 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness 4000 nits 600 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
Screen-to-body ratio 90 % 90.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 161.5 mm (6.36 in) 163.4 mm (6.43 in)
Width 74.6 mm (2.94 in) 77 mm (3.03 in)
Thickness 7.7 mm (0.3 in) 7.5 mm (0.3 in)
Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 201 g (7.09 oz)
Water resistance No IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel n/a Glass
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - White
- Green
- Pink		 - White
- Black
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor 200
90 %
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
90.1 %

Performance

Testing Honor 200 and Oppo Reno 14 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Max Frequency 2630 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))		 - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes MediaTek NPU 880
Graphics Adreno 720 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU Cores 512 896
GPU Frequency 975 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Honor 200
1147
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
1617
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Honor 200
3398
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
6406
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)11471617
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)33986406
Geekbench Compute (GPU)3592n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor 200], [Oppo Reno 14 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Honor 200
790835
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
1675507
CPU238342388482
GPU267714610993
Memory133169375299
UX151610300733
NanoReview Score7908351675507

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB
- 16 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 3.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) Android 15
UI Skin MagicOS 9.0 ColorOS 15

Battery

Volume 5200 mAh 6200 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 80 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) n/a
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (75% in 30 min) Yes (73% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:45 h 0:53 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3.5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 112 ° 116 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/1.8
Focal lengthn/a24 mm
SensorSony IMX906n/a
Sensor size1/1.56n/a
Pixel size1 μmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.4f/2.8
Focal lengthn/a80 mm
SensorSony IMX856Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size1/1.31/2.76
Pixel sizen/a0.6 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix12 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal lengthn/a16 mm
StabilizationDigitalDigital
Main camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Honor 200
133
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
n/a
Video quality
Honor 200
121
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
n/a
Overall camera score
Honor 200
130
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
n/a
Bokeh65n/a
Preview61n/a
Zoom124n/a
Sources: DxOMark [Honor 200]

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.0
Focal length n/a 21 mm
Sensor CMOS Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size n/a 1/2.76
Pixel size n/a 0.6 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
LTE category18n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date May, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 499 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 550
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 100 W Yes 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 14 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below