Home Phone comparison Honor 300 and Honor 200 Smart - Which is better?

Honor 300 vs Honor 200 Smart

74 out 100
Honor 300
VS
58 out 100
Honor 200 Smart
Honor 300
Honor 200 Smart

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 300 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Honor 200 Smart, Manufactured in September, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor 300
  • Higher pixel density: 436ppi
  • Lighter design: 175g vs 193g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5200mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Honor 200 Smart
  • Larger display: 6.8in

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 4/256 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor 300 and Honor 200 Smart
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Honor 300
vs
Honor 200 Smart

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED TFT LCD
Size 6.7 in 6.8 in
Resolution 1200x2664 pixels 1080x2412 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.98:9 20:9
Pixel density 436 ppi 389 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max brightness 1200 nits 850 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
Screen-to-body ratio 90.8 % 87.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 161 mm (6.34 in) 166.9 mm (6.57 in)
Width 74.2 mm (2.92 in) 76.8 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness 7 mm (0.28 in) 8.24 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 175 g (6.17 oz) 193 g (6.81 oz)
Water resistance IP65 IP64
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Green
- Purple		 - Black
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Honor 300
90.8 %
Honor 200 Smart
87.1 %

Performance

Testing Honor 300 and Honor 200 Smart In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Max Frequency 2630 MHz 1950 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
- 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
- 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.2 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC Samsung
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Yes Yes
Graphics Adreno 720 Adreno 613
GPU Cores 512 192
GPU Frequency 975 MHz 955 MHz
FLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS 244.5 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Honor 300
1125
Honor 200 Smart
920
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Honor 300
3311
Honor 200 Smart
2130
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1125920
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)33112130
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor 300]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Honor 300
806918
Honor 200 Smart
468520
CPU264192154989
GPU24881050152
Memory132902154971
UX161014108408
NanoReview Score806918468520

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB
- 16 GB		 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency n/a 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 14
UI Skin MagicOS 9 MagicOS 8.0

Battery

Volume 5300 mAh 5200 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 35 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (53% in 15 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 0:46 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Wide-angle lens 112 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/1.8
Focal lengthn/a24 mm
SensorOmnivision OVH9000Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size1/1.561/2.76
Pixel size1 μm0.64 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix12 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.2n/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.1 f/2.0
Sensor n/a CMOS
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced December, 2024 yr September, 2024 yr
Release Date December, 2024 yr September, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($) 320 199
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 100 W Yes 35 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 300 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below