Home Phone comparison Honor 300 and Oppo Reno 11 - Which is better?

Honor 300 vs Oppo Reno 11

74 out 100
Honor 300
VS
63 out 100
Oppo Reno 11
Honor 300
Oppo Reno 11

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 300 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Oppo Reno 11, Manufactured in January, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7050. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Honor 300
  • Higher pixel density: 436ppi
  • Lighter design: 175g vs 182g
  • Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5000mAh
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 11

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 8/256 GB
    - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB
    - 16/512 GB    		 - 8/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB
    - 12/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Honor 300 and Oppo Reno 11
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    Honor 300
    vs
    Oppo Reno 11

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type AMOLED OLED
    Size 6.7 in 6.7 in
    Resolution 1200x2664 pixels 1080x2412 pixels
    Aspect ratio 19.98:9 20:9
    Pixel density 436 ppi 394 ppi
    Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
    Max brightness 1200 nits 800 nits
    HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10+
    Touch Sampling Rate n/a 240 Hz
    Screen-to-body ratio 90.8 % 89.8 %
    Features - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming    		 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 161 mm (6.34 in) 162.4 mm (6.39 in)
    Width 74.2 mm (2.92 in) 74.3 mm (2.93 in)
    Thickness 7 mm (0.28 in) 7.99 mm (0.31 in)
    Weight 175 g (6.17 oz) 182 g (6.42 oz)
    Water resistance IP65 No
    Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
    Back panel n/a Glass
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - White
    - Black
    - Gray
    - Green
    - Purple    		 - Gray
    - Green
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Honor 300
    90.8 %
    Oppo Reno 11
    89.8 %

    Performance

    Testing Honor 300 and Oppo Reno 11 In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 7050
    Max Frequency 2630 MHz 2600 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
    Architecture - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
    - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
    - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))    		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
    Neural Processor Yes MediaTek APU 550
    Graphics Adreno 720 Mali-G68 MP4
    GPU Cores 512 256
    GPU Frequency 975 MHz 800 MHz
    FLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS 686 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Honor 300
    1125
    Oppo Reno 11
    1086
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Honor 300
    3311
    Oppo Reno 11
    2560
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)11251086
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)33112560
    Sources: Geekbench v6 [Honor 300], [Oppo Reno 11]
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Honor 300
    806918
    Oppo Reno 11
    453163
    CPU264192112688
    GPU248810107979
    Memory132902106261
    UX161014126235
    NanoReview Score806918453163

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 8 GB
    - 12 GB
    - 16 GB    		 - 8 GB
    - 12 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency n/a 2133 MHz
    Channels 4 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 256 GB
    - 512 GB    		- 128 GB
    - 256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 2.2
    Memory CardNoMicroSD

    Software

    OS Android 15 Android 14
    UI Skin MagicOS 9 ColorOS 14

    Battery

    Volume 5300 mAh 5000 mAh
    Max Charging Power 100 W 67 W
    Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (53% in 15 min) Yes (50% in 19 min)
    Full Charge Time 0:46 h 0:45 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Optical, 2x
    Flash Dual LED LED
    Stabilization Optical Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion n/a 480 fps (1080p)
    Wide-angle lens 112 ° 112 °
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 12 MP    		 Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 32 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode    		 - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/2.0f/1.8
    Focal lengthn/a26 mm
    SensorOmnivision OVH9000Sony LYT-600
    Sensor size1/1.561/1.95
    Pixel size1 μm0.7 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationOpticalOptical
    Telephoto
    Matrixn/a32 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.0
    Focal lengthn/a47 mm
    Sensorn/aSony IMX709
    Sensor sizen/a1/2.74
    Pixel sizen/a0.8 μm
    Stabilizationn/aDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrix12 MP8 MP
    Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
    Focal lengthn/a16 mm
    Sensorn/aSony IMX355
    Sensor sizen/a1/4.0
    Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
    StabilizationDigitalDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 50 MP 32 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 6528x3680 pixels
    Aperture f/2.1 f/2.4
    Focal length n/a 22 mm
    Sensor n/a Sony IMX709
    Sensor size n/a 1/2.74
    Pixel size n/a 0.8 μm
    Autofocus Phase autofocus No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display    		 - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG    		 - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort No n/a
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS    		 - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Yes Yes
    Infrared Port Yes Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
    3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
    LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66)
    5G SupportYesYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo Stereo
    3.5 mm Jack No No
    FM Radio No No
    Dolby Atmos n/a No

    Other

    Class Mid-range Mid-range
    Announced December, 2024 yr January, 2024 yr
    Release Date December, 2024 yr January, 2024 yr
    Launch Price ($) 320 370
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor    		 - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 100 W Yes 67 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 300 the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below