Honor 400 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco C71
63
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 400 Lite Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, vs Xiaomi Poco C71, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Lighter design: 161g vs 193g
- Higher battery capacity: 5230mAh vs 5200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.2
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C71
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.1:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 3500 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9 % | 85.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 161 mm (6.34 in) | 171.79 mm (6.76 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | No |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 956 | 437 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2303 | 1438 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 143 | 708 |
| CPU | 161440 | 92232 |
| GPU | 78966 | 30830 |
| Memory | 116384 | 78630 |
| UX | 140445 | 78630 |
| NanoReview Score | 497235 | 270293 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9.0 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5230 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:32 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 5 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 299 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 70 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Lite the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
