Honor 400 Pro vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 400 Pro Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus, Manufactured in July, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 400 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 40 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 160.4g vs 205g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 89.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.8 mm (6.33 in) | 163.9 mm (6.45 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 6.49 mm (0.26 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 160.4 g (5.66 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Blue |
- White - Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2110 | 719 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6408 | 1975 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 14352 | 1461 |
| CPU | 468854 | 137544 |
| GPU | 775461 | 72008 |
| Memory | 370578 | 116943 |
| UX | 324467 | 107662 |
| NanoReview Score | 1939360 | 434157 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9 | HIOS 15.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (51% in 15 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:45 h | 0:55 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | n/a | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 799 | 220 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0