Honor 400 vs Honor X6c
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 400 Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.55 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Honor X6c, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 400
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 184g vs 199g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Honor X6c
- Larger display: 6.61in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.55 in | 6.61 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 pixels | 720x1604 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 266 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1010 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2 % | 84.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) | 165 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP66 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gold - Blue |
- White - Black - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2630 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 720 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1142 | 430 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3180 | 1394 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 4046 | n/a |
| CPU | 267068 | 84372 |
| GPU | 234936 | 34982 |
| Memory | 193158 | 70145 |
| UX | 159716 | 65156 |
| NanoReview Score | 854878 | 254655 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9 | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 5300 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (44% in 15 min) | Yes (30% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:57 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8160x6120 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | n/a |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | n/a |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 2592x1944 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.2 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 499 | 140 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
