Honor 400 vs Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
73
out 100
VS
61
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 400 Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.55 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, vs Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 400
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 184g vs 224g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 15 5G
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5300mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.55 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2736 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.2 % | 83.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) | 171.1 mm (6.74 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 82.1 mm (3.23 in) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP66 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2630 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.3 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 720 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 975 MHz | 900 MHz |
| FLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS | 460.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1142 | 935 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3180 | 2109 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 4046 | n/a |
| CPU | 267068 | 153170 |
| GPU | 234936 | 91687 |
| Memory | 193158 | 99792 |
| UX | 159716 | 128505 |
| NanoReview Score | 854878 | 473154 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5300 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (44% in 15 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:57 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 499 | 230 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes, 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
