Honor 600 Pro vs Honor 600 Smart
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 600 Pro Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.57 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Honor 600 Smart, Manufactured in June, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 600 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 458ppi
- Lighter design: 200g vs 209g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.1
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Honor 600 Smart
- Larger display: 6.87in
- Higher battery capacity: 7700mAh vs 7000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.57 in | 6.87 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2728 pixels | 720x1592 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 458 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1020 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9 % | 86.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156 mm (6.14 in) | 168.3 mm (6.63 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 78.5 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Orange |
- Black - Silver |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 4470 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.3 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3058 | 927 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9377 | 2205 |
| CPU | 949476 | 227026 |
| GPU | 1143046 | 47384 |
| Memory | 329645 | 126545 |
| UX | 620638 | 169398 |
| NanoReview Score | 3042805 | 570353 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5300 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | n/a | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 10 | MagicOS 10 |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 7700 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (71% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:48 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 11:25 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 19:55 h | n/a |
| Games | 08:33 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 136 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16384x12288 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 (0.71) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | n/a |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2026 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2026 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 785 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 600 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0