Honor 90 Lite vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 90 Lite Manufactured in June, 2023, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6020, vs Vivo iQOO Z11x, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 90 Lite
- Higher pixel density: 391ppi
- Lighter design: 179g vs 219g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Larger display: 6.76in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7200mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/256 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.76 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 pixels | 1080x2344 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.9:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 85.9 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.9 mm (6.41 in) | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 74.5 mm (2.93 in) | 78.4 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 7.48 mm (0.29 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 730 | 1064 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1927 | 2878 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3062 |
| CPU | 135029 | 329972 |
| GPU | 62888 | 147724 |
| Memory | 103707 | 155228 |
| UX | 101222 | 289303 |
| NanoReview Score | 402846 | 922227 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 7.1 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (55% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 43 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:52 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 11584x8688 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 100 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 100 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.93 (0.34) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 5 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | June, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 300 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11x the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0