Honor 90 Pro vs Honor X7d
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor 90 Pro Manufactured in June, 2023, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, vs Honor X7d, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor 90 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 437ppi
- Lighter design: 192g vs 208g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Reasons to choose Honor X7d
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 12/128 GB - 16/128 GB - 16/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 pixels | 1610x720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.89:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8 % | 86.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.8 mm (6.45 in) | 166.8 mm (6.57 in) |
| Width | 74.9 mm (2.95 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP65 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Blue - Green |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1843.2 GFLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1705 | 465 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4464 | 1468 |
| CPU | 358602 | 108352 |
| GPU | 494153 | 38159 |
| Memory | 221955 | 114138 |
| UX | 232506 | 72107 |
| NanoReview Score | 1307216 | 332756 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | n/a |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 8.0 | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (56% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 42 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:37 h | 2:20 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 16256x12192 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 32 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.56 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 32 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6112 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | Yes | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | n/a |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2023 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 490 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | Yes, 35 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 90 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0