Honor GT vs ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
83
out 100
VS
64
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor GT Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, vs ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G, Manufactured in May, 2025with chipsetUnisoc T9100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor GT
- Higher pixel density: 436ppi
- Lighter design: 196g vs 209g
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose ZTE Nubia Neo 3 GT 5G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5300mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1200x2664 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 436 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7 % | 0 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 161 mm (6.34 in) | 167.5 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 74.2 mm (2.92 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- Gray - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Unisoc T9100 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2700 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2.1 (Cortex-A55) - 3/2.3 (Cortex-A76) - 1/2.7 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Mali-G57 MP4 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 903-1000 MHz | 780 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS | 199.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2180 | 890 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7202 | 2441 |
| CPU | 436952 | 187773 |
| GPU | 581089 | 93539 |
| Memory | 498023 | 131216 |
| UX | 422975 | 124668 |
| NanoReview Score | 1939039 | 537196 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 5300 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (59% in 15 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:41 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | Sony IMX906 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 405 | 230 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor GT the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
