Honor Win vs Infinix Note Edge
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor Win Manufactured in January, 2026, with display 6.83 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, vs Infinix Note Edge, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor Win
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 10000mAh vs 6500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
Reasons to choose Infinix Note Edge
- Lighter design: 190g vs 229g
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2000 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7 % | 89.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.1 mm (6.42 in) | 163.1 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 76.6 mm (3.02 in) | 77.4 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 7.2 mm (0.28 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP65 |
| Cooling system | Active fan | n/a |
| Frame | Metal | n/a |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7100 |
| Max Frequency | 4600 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | 6/3.63 () | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | n/a |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Mali-G610 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1200 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3686.4 GFLOPS | 256 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3663 | 976 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 10928 | 2892 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2403 |
| CPU | 1191717 | 200128 |
| GPU | 1506442 | 117214 |
| Memory | 602800 | 122323 |
| UX | 967154 | 144476 |
| NanoReview Score | 4268113 | 584141 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 10 | XOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 10000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (80 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 (0.64) | 1/2.0 (0.5) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 (0.5) | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 12 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2026 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 500 | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor Win the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0