Honor X60 vs Honor 400
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X60 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, vs Honor 400, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor X60
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5300mAh
Reasons to choose Honor 400
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 184g vs 189g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.55 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1264x2736 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.1:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 850 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4 % | 90.2 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.98 mm (6.53 in) | 156.5 mm (6.16 in) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 7.88 mm (0.31 in) | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | IP66 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | n/a |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Green |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)) - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 512 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 998.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 957 | 1142 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2248 | 3180 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 140 | 4046 |
| CPU | 162363 | 267068 |
| GPU | 79026 | 234936 |
| Memory | 110468 | 193158 |
| UX | 142955 | 159716 |
| NanoReview Score | 494812 | 854878 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 8.0 | MagicOS 9 |
Battery
| Volume | 5800 mAh | 5300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 66 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (44% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:57 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP | Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung HM6 | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.56 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 12 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | Yes 66 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
