Honor X60 vs Tecno Spark 30 5G
61
out 100
VS
51
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X60 Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, vs Tecno Spark 30 5G, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor X60
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 389ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 30 5G
- Lighter design: 176g vs 189g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.1:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 850 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.4 % | 84.5 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.98 mm (6.53 in) | 165.4 mm (6.51 in) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 7.88 mm (0.31 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Green |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 957 | 734 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2248 | 1952 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 140 | n/a |
| CPU | 162363 | 137012 |
| GPU | 79026 | 68105 |
| Memory | 110468 | 101883 |
| UX | 142955 | 120110 |
| NanoReview Score | 494812 | 427110 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 8.0 | HIOS 14.5 |
Battery
| Volume | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:49 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP | Standard: 108 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Sensor | Samsung HM6 | Samsung HM6 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | 130 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | Yes 18 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X60 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
