Honor X7c vs Samsung Galaxy A02
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X7c Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.77 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Samsung Galaxy A02, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetMediatek MT6739W. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor X7c
- Larger display: 6.77in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 201g vs 206g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Fingerprint scanner
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A02
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/256 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.5 in |
| Resolution | 1610x720 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 270 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4 % | 82 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.9 mm (6.57 in) | 164 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 75.9 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- Black - Blue - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | No |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek MT6739W |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 4 (4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | No |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8100 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 8 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 570 MHz |
| FLOPS | 319.2 GFLOPS | 9.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 474 | 470 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1531 | 1525 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 385 | n/a |
| CPU | 115360 | 50286 |
| GPU | 43598 | 6591 |
| Memory | 121036 | 34538 |
| UX | 82690 | 39957 |
| NanoReview Score | 362684 | 131372 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
2 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 933 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 1 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | n/a | 9.4 GB |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 8.0 | One UI Core 3.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | n/a |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 39 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 2:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL HM6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | UMTS B1 (2100), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 155 | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 35 W | Yes 10 W |
Note
Honor X7c:
In black color, the smartphone is 8.09 thick and weighs 199g, while the green and white versions are 8.24 and 201g. Battery capacity varies by country: either 5,200 mAh or 6,000 mAh.","According to the official website, the Honor X7c can survive iersion up to 25 cm for no more than 3 minutes or 0.5 meters for up to 1 minute.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Honor X7c the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0