Honor X7d vs Vivo V70 FE
Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X7d Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685, vs Vivo V70 FE, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Honor X7d
Reasons to choose Vivo V70 FE
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 449ppi
- Lighter design: 202g vs 208g
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/128 GB - 16/128 GB - 16/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1610x720 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 449 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.8 mm (6.57 in) | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) | 76.2 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 7.59 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Gold - Green |
- Silver - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Mediatek Dimensity 7360 Turbo |
| Max Frequency | 2800 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 465 | 1025 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1468 | 2882 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2523 |
| CPU | 108352 | 337926 |
| GPU | 38159 | 123256 |
| Memory | 114138 | 200218 |
| UX | 72107 | 242810 |
| NanoReview Score | 332756 | 904210 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | MagicOS 9.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 35 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 42 min) | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:20 h | 1:10 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | n/a | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 (0.32) |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | n/a | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 350 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 35 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo V70 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0