Honor X9c vs Vivo X100s

69 out 100

VS

82 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Honor X9c Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, vs Vivo X100s, Manufactured in May, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Honor X9c

Lighter design: 189g vs 203g
Higher battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5100mAh

Reasons to choose Vivo X100s

Higher pixel density: 453ppi
Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
Supports DisplayPort
Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Honor X9c and Vivo X100s

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Honor X9c

91

Vivo X100s

90

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Honor X9c

69

Vivo X100s

79

Performance

App & system performance

Honor X9c

44

Vivo X100s

85

Games

3D gaming performance

Honor X9c

28

Vivo X100s

91

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Honor X9c

90

Vivo X100s

73

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Honor X9c

66

Vivo X100s

82

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Honor X9c

69

Vivo X100s

82

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	AMOLED	AMOLED
Size	6.78 in	6.78 in
Resolution	1224x2700 pixels	1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio	19.85:9	20:9
Pixel density	437 ppi	453 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes	Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness	4000 nits	3000 nits
HDR support	n/a	Yes HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate	n/a	300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio	90.7 %	89.2 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	162.8 mm (6.41 in)	164.12 mm (6.46 in)
Width	75.5 mm (2.97 in)	75.78 mm (2.98 in)
Thickness	7.98 mm (0.31 in)	7.8 mm (0.31 in)
Weight	189 g (6.67 oz)	203 g (7.16 oz)
Water resistance	IP65	IP69
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	n/a	Glass
Frame	n/a	Metal
Colors	- Black - Green - Purple	- White - Silver - Gray - Green
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Display	Yes In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Honor X9c

90.7 %

Vivo X100s

89.2 %

Performance

Testing Honor X9c and Vivo X100s In benchmarks

Chipset	Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1	MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
Max Frequency	2200 MHz	3400 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (4 + 4)	8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture	- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A78)	- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4)
Process	Samsung	TSMC
Transistor Size	4 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	Yes	MediaTek APU 790
Graphics	Adreno 710	Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores	256	1536
GPU Frequency	676 MHz	1300 MHz
FLOPS	346.1 GFLOPS	3993.6 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Honor X9c

940

Vivo X100s

2284

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Honor X9c

2790

Vivo X100s

7661

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	940	2284
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	2790	7661
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	n/a	15126

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Vivo X100s]

AnTuTu 10

Honor X9c

577268

Vivo X100s

1968797

CPU	168676	423613
GPU	97845	827378
Memory	171621	367250
UX	139126	350556
NanoReview Score	577268	1968797

3DMark Wild Life

Honor X9c

n/a

Vivo X100s

15221

Sources: 3DMark [Vivo X100s]

PCMark 3.0

Honor X9c

n/a

Vivo X100s

14014

Writing score	n/a	22183
Web score	n/a	12054
Video editing	n/a	5570
Data manipulation	n/a	12954
NanoReview Score	n/a	14014

Memory

RAM Size	- 8 GB - 12 GB	- 12 GB - 16 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR5	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	2750 MHz	4200 MHz
Channels	2	4

Storage Capacity	- 256 GB - 512 GB	- 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB
Storage Type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory Card	No	No

Software

OS	Android 14	Android 14
UI Skin	MagicOS 8.0	OriginOS 4

Battery

Volume	6600 mAh	5100 mAh
Max Charging Power	66 W	100 W
Battery Type	Silicon Carbon (Si/C)	Li-Po
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	No	No
Reverse Charging	Yes	Yes
Fast Charging	Yes	Yes (60% in 16 min)
Full Charge Time	n/a	0:33 h

Main camera

Matrix	108 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	12000x9000 pixels	8192x6144 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Optical, 3x
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	No
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion	240 fps (720p)	960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens	n/a	119 °
Lenses count	Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP	Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support

Matrix	108 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.8	f/1.6
Sensor	Samsung HM6	Sony IMX920
Sensor size	1/1.67	1/1.31
Pixel size	1 μm	1.2 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus	Laser autofocus
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	n/a	64 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.6
Focal length	n/a	70 mm
Sensor	n/a	Omnivision OV64B
Sensor size	n/a	1/2
Pixel size	n/a	0.7 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Matrix	5 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	15 mm
Sensor	n/a	Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size	n/a	1/2.76
Pixel size	n/a	0.64 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	16 MP	32 MP
Photo resolution	3456x4608 pixels	6528x4896 pixels
Aperture	f/2.5	f/2.0
Focal length	n/a	20 mm
Sensor	CMOS	Samsung S5KGD2
Sensor size	n/a	1/2.8
Pixel size	n/a	0.8 μm
Autofocus	No	No
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)	Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.1	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	No	Yes
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC
NFC*	Varies by region	Yes
Infrared Port	Yes	Yes

SIM Count*	2	2
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	Dual SIM Standby	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	No	n/a
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	n/a	GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bands	n/a	WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*	n/a	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41)
LTE category	18	n/a
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

Speakers	Stereo	Stereo
3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	No	Yes

Other

Class	Mid-range	Flagship
Announced	November, 2024 yr	May, 2024 yr
Release Date	November, 2024 yr	May, 2024 yr
Launch Price ($)	350	n/a
Sensors	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	Yes 66 W	Yes 100 W

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100s the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Honor X9c

0 (0%)

Vivo X100s

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Honor X9c vs Vivo X100s

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments