Huawei Honor 10 vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Honor 10 Manufactured in April, 2018, with display 5.84 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 970, vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8450. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 10
- Lighter design: 153g vs 201g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 3400mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 4.2
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 5.84 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2280 pixels | 1272x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.9:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 432 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 77.6 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| Contrast | 1423:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 149.6 mm (5.89 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 71.2 mm (2.8 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm (0.3 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 153 g (5.4 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray - Blue - Purple |
- White - Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 970 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max Frequency | 2360 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.84 (Cortex A53) - 4/2.36 (Cortex A73) |
- 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Mali-G72 MP12 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU Cores | 216 | 896 |
| GPU Frequency | 767 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 331.8 GFLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 526 | 1617 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1570 | 6406 |
| CPU | 80042 | 388482 |
| GPU | 106499 | 610993 |
| Memory | 81766 | 375299 |
| UX | 85160 | 300733 |
| NanoReview Score | 353467 | 1675507 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 75 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 827 | n/a |
| Writing score | 6772 | n/a |
| Web score | 5225 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5075 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5611 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 6542 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1833 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 8.1 (Upgradeable to Android 10.0) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 12 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 3400 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 225 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 25 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:20 h | 0:53 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:33 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 09:58 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:09 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 72 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4616x3464 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 16 MP Monochrome: 24 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX498 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 80 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.6 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 16 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 24 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 5760x4312 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.9 μm | 0.6 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B800/B900/B1800/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | April, 2018 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2018 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 450 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 550 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 14 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0