Huawei Honor 8A vs Tecno Spark Go 2
31
out 100
VS
46
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Honor 8A Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.09 with chipsetMediaTek Helio P35, vs Tecno Spark Go 2, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 8A
- Higher pixel density: 282ppi
- Lighter design: 150g vs 186g
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 2
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 4.2
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.09 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1560 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.2 % | 84.2 % |
| sRGB gamut | 98.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 36.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1111:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.2 mm (6.15 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 73.5 mm (2.89 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- White - Black - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 478 | 438 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 1437 |
| CPU | 57867 | 95156 |
| GPU | 14142 | 26471 |
| Memory | 34794 | 109093 |
| UX | 26218 | 70926 |
| NanoReview Score | 133021 | 301646 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 15 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 9 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 3020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | n/a | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 3:00 h | 1:55 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:15 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:07 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:24 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 6 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 220 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 80 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark Go 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
