Huawei Honor 8A vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro
31
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Honor 8A Manufactured in March, 2019, with display 6.09 with chipsetMediaTek Helio P35, vs Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Honor 8A
- Higher pixel density: 282ppi
- Lighter design: 150g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 3020mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 4.2
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.09 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 720x1560 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 282 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 79.2 % | 84.2 % |
| sRGB gamut | 98.1 % | n/a |
| Response time | 36.4 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1111:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 156.2 mm (6.15 in) | 171.6 mm (6.76 in) |
| Width | 73.5 mm (2.89 in) | 79.5 mm (3.13 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 150 g (5.29 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Blue - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes rear | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 478 | 433 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1521 | 1422 |
| CPU | 57867 | 138575 |
| GPU | 14142 | 26709 |
| Memory | 34794 | 78149 |
| UX | 26218 | 97672 |
| NanoReview Score | 133021 | 341105 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 933 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 32 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 15 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 9 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 3020 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | n/a | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (20% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 3:00 h | 2:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:15 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 11:07 h | n/a |
| Games | 04:24 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 95 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA B1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 6 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | January, 2019 yr | February, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2019 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 220 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 129 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi A7 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
