Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
74
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Mate 50 Pro Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 6.74 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Lighter design: 209g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 4700mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1212x2616 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 428 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.1 mm (6.38 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 75.5 mm (2.97 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Orange - Purple |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 3190 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1843.2 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1740 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4379 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 347330 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 479118 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 189225 | 709892 |
| UX | 221513 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 1237186 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 39 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 61 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 10268 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 13 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:41 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:35 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 13:12 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 05:03 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 84 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 3840 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.4 - 4.0 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 90 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX688 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 80 | n/a |
| Preview | 63 | n/a |
| Zoom | 148 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 21 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | Yes | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM Bands 2/3/5/8(1900/1800/850/900 MHz) | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1199 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
