Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
74
out 100
VS
61
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Mate 50 Pro Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 6.74 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, vs Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, Manufactured in December, 2020with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher pixel density: 428ppi
- Lighter design: 209g vs 218g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4700mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1212x2616 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 428 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 630 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91 % | 85.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 97.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | 2358 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 42.2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1252:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.1 mm (6.38 in) | 165.1 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 75.5 mm (2.97 in) | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 9.3 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Orange - Purple |
- Black - Silver - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max Frequency | 3190 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1843.2 GFLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1740 | 1263 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4379 | 3482 |
| CPU | 347330 | 222519 |
| GPU | 479118 | 194682 |
| Memory | 189225 | 140261 |
| UX | 221513 | 184083 |
| NanoReview Score | 1237186 | 741545 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.9 °C | 41.5 °C |
| Stability | 39 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 61 fps | 22 fps |
| Graphics Score | 10268 | 3799 |
| Writing score | n/a | 13489 |
| Web score | n/a | 6810 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5610 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6940 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9993 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 21 GB | 19.5 GB |
| UI Skin | EMUI 13 | MIUI 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (61% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:41 h | 0:58 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:35 h | 10:54 h |
| Video Playback | 13:12 h | 15:36 h |
| Games | 05:03 h | 05:58 h |
| Standby Mode | 84 h | 125 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12032x9024 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 3840 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Macro: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.4 - 4.0 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Samsung S5KHMX |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.33 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 90 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX688 | Omnivision OV13B10 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.7 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 80 | n/a |
| Preview | 63 | n/a |
| Zoom | 148 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 5963x3354 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3T2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | Yes | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM Bands 2/3/5/8(1900/1800/850/900 MHz) | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 22 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | September, 2022 yr | September, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2022 yr | December, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1199 | 710 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei Mate 50 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
