Huawei Mate 50 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
74
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Mate 50 Pro Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 6.74 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1, vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 50 Pro
- Larger display: 6.74in
- Higher pixel density: 428ppi
- Lighter design: 209g vs 215g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Higher battery capacity: 5160mAh vs 4700mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 6/125 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.74 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1212x2616 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 428 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 550 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91 % | 84.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 95.1 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 119 Hz | 2404 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 37.4 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 995:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.1 mm (6.38 in) | 165.3 mm (6.51 in) |
| Width | 75.5 mm (2.97 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 9.4 mm (0.37 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP53 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Orange - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 |
| Max Frequency | 3190 MHz | 2960 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.75 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.96 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1843.2 GFLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1740 | 973 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4379 | 2589 |
| CPU | 347330 | 181709 |
| GPU | 479118 | 155743 |
| Memory | 189225 | 126967 |
| UX | 221513 | 177878 |
| NanoReview Score | 1237186 | 642297 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.9 °C | 44.1 °C |
| Stability | 39 % | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | 61 fps | 20 fps |
| Graphics Score | 10268 | 3456 |
| Writing score | n/a | 13393 |
| Web score | n/a | 8062 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6035 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 8470 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10579 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 21 GB | 13 GB |
| UI Skin | EMUI 13 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 4700 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 66 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (55% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:41 h | 1:15 h |
| Web Browsing | 06:35 h | 08:43 h |
| Video Playback | 13:12 h | 12:45 h |
| Games | 05:03 h | 05:20 h |
| Standby Mode | 84 h | 117 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 3840 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.4 - 4.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony IMX582 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 64 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/3.5 | n/a |
| Focal length | 90 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX688 | Omnivision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 80 | n/a |
| Preview | 63 | n/a |
| Zoom | 148 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 5480x3648 pixels |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | Yes | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM Bands 2/3/5/8(1900/1800/850/900 MHz) | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | UMTC B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 20 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2022 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2022 yr | April, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1199 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Face Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 66 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei Mate 50 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
