Home Phone comparison Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus and Vivo X200s - Which is better?

Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus vs Vivo X200s

78 out 100
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
VS
89 out 100
Vivo X200s
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
Vivo X200s

Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.9 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9020, vs Vivo X200s, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
Reasons to choose Vivo X200s
  • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
  • Lighter design: 205g vs 226g
  • Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 5700mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus and Vivo X200s
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Mate 70 Pro Plus
vs
Vivo X200s

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.9 in 6.67 in
Resolution 1316x2832 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 440 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max brightness 2500 nits n/a
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 89.2 % 90.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.6 mm (6.48 in) 160.1 mm (6.3 in)
Width 79.5 mm (3.13 in) 74.29 mm (2.92 in)
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 in) 7.99 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 226 g (7.97 oz) 205 g (7.23 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Gray
- Green		 - Silver
- Gray
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
89.2 %
Vivo X200s
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus and Vivo X200s In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset HiSilicon Kirin 9020 MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max Frequency 2500 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU Cores 12 (2 + 6 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.6 (Taishan-Little)
- 6/2.15 (TaiShan V120)
- 2/2.5 (TaiShan V121)		 - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925)
Process SMIC TSMC
Transistor Size 7 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor Da Vinci MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Maleoon 920 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 1024 1536
GPU Frequency 840 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 1720.3 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
1604
Vivo X200s
2949
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
5138
Vivo X200s
9258
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)16042949
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)51389258
Geekbench Compute (GPU)4949n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Huawei Mate 70 Pro Plus
1248520
Vivo X200s
2651991
CPU351901587082
GPU2785171173209
Memory405011421617
UX213091470083
NanoReview Score12485202651991

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 16 GB - 12 GB
- 16 GB
Memory Type n/a LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5333 MHz
Channels n/a 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		- 256 GB
- 512 GB
- 1024 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS HarmonyOS 4.3 Android 15
UI Skin n/a OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5700 mAh 6200 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 90 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (88 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging Yes (Wireless) Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:54 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 960 fps (720p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 48 MP
Ultra-wide: 40 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.4 - 4.0f/1.6
Focal length24 mm23 mm
Sensorn/aSony IMX921
Sensor sizen/a1/1.56
Pixel size1.6 μm1 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix48 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.1f/2.6
Focal length93 mm70 mm
Sensorn/aSony IMX882
Sensor sizen/a1/1.95
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix40 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length13 mm15 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung JD1
Sensor sizen/a1/3.14
Pixel sizen/a0.7 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 13 MP 32 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels 6528x4896 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 18 mm 20 mm
Sensor n/a Samsung KD1
Sensor size n/a 1/3.44
Autofocus No n/a
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor Yes No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes DP 1.2 Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

Speakers Stereo n/a
3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced November, 2024 yr April, 2025 yr
Release Date November, 2024 yr April, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 1100 600
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Face Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 100 W Yes 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200s the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below