Home Phone comparison Huawei Mate 80 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Ultra - Which is better?

Huawei Mate 80 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra

84 out 100
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
VS
96 out 100
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Mate 80 Pro Manufactured in November, 2025, with display 6.75 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Huawei Mate 80 Pro
  • Lighter design: 219g vs 235g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.82in
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 5750mAh
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Huawei Mate 80 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
vs
Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.75 in 6.82 in
Resolution 1280x2832 pixels 1440x3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.8:9
Pixel density 460 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness n/a 1800 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+ Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 90.9 % 90 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
n/a
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
3396 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 161.85 mm (6.37 in) 163.16 mm (6.42 in)
Width 76 mm (2.99 in) 76.97 mm (3.03 in)
Thickness 7.95 mm (0.31 in) 8.65 mm (0.34 in)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 235 g (8.29 oz)
Water resistance IP68 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Gold
- Green		 - White
- Green
- Orange
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
90.9 %
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
90 %

Performance

Testing Huawei Mate 80 Pro and Oppo Find X9 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency n/a 4600 MHz
CPU Cores n/a 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture n/a - 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance)
- 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)
Process n/a TSMC
Transistor Size n/a 3 nm
Neural Processor n/a Hexagon
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
1795
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
3646
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
5178
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
11276
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)17953646
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)517811276
Geekbench Compute (GPU)6943n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Find X9 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
1736335
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
4086107
CPU4491221166693
GPU3959651523262
Memory564381509363
UX326867886789
NanoReview Score17363354086107

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage Typen/aUFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS HarmonyOS 6 Android 16
UI Skin n/a ColorOS 16

Battery

Volume 5750 mAh 7050 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 100 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (80 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse Charging Yes, (Wireless) Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes Yes (75% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time n/a 0:45 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Huawei Mate 80 Pro
n/a
Oppo Find X9 Ultra
37:00
Web Browsingn/a16:45 h
Video Playbackn/a26:15 h
Gamesn/a08:23 h
Standby Moden/a144 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 200 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 4x Optical, 10x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 240 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 480 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 120 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 48 MP
Ultra-wide: 40 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.4 - 4.0f/1.5
Focal length24 mm23 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYTIA-901
Sensor sizen/a1/1.12 (0.89)
Pixel size1.6 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix48 MP200 MP
Aperturef/2.1f/2.2
Focal length93 mm70 mm
Sensorn/aOmniVision OV52A
Sensor sizen/a1/1.28 (0.78)
Pixel sizen/a0.61 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix40 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length13 mm14 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYTIA-600
Sensor sizen/a1/1.95 (0.51)
Pixel sizen/a0.8 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 13 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 4160x3120 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 18 mm 21 mm
Sensor n/a Samsung ISOCELL JN5
Sensor size n/a 1/2.75 (0.36)
Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor Yes No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G Bandsn/aWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19
LTE Bands*n/aLTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos No n/a

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced November, 2025 yr April, 2026 yr
Release Date November, 2025 yr May, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) 840 1299
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Face Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below