Huawei P30 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
54
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei P30 Pro Manufactured in May, 2019, with display 6.47 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 980, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei P30 Pro
- Lighter design: 192g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 4200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.47 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 570 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.6 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 231 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3.6 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158 mm (6.22 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 73.4 mm (2.89 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Orange |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 980 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.92 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.6 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G76 MP10 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 360 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 720 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 518.4 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 912 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2259 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 195913 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 159297 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 117921 | 709892 |
| UX | 128557 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 601688 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 40 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 48 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 14 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 2490 | n/a |
| Writing score | 10855 | n/a |
| Web score | 7067 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5710 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7553 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 8525 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | Nano Memory | No |
Software
| OS | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 10) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 13.4 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | EMUI 12 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 4200 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 40 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes SuperCharge (70% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:05 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:25 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 13:36 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 05:24 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 99 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 7360x4912 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 5x | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 40 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 20 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 40 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX650 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/3.4 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 125 mm | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.7 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 29 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | BSI CMOS | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900 | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2600) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 21 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2019 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1000 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
