Huawei Pura 70 Pro vs Vivo X100 Pro
75
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Pura 70 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 6.8 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9010, vs Vivo X100 Pro, Manufactured in November, 2023with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Pura 70 Pro
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Lighter design: 220g vs 225g
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5050mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1260x2844 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 2500 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 369 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.6 mm (6.4 in) | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 75.1 mm (2.96 in) | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 220 g (7.76 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9010 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 12 (2 + 6 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.55 (Cortex-A510) - 6/2.18 (TaiShan V121) - 2/2.3 (TaiShan V121) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Da Vinci | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1536 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1420 | 2231 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4264 | 7526 |
| CPU | 316992 | 490601 |
| GPU | 194727 | 893392 |
| Memory | 240630 | 446780 |
| UX | 187267 | 321411 |
| NanoReview Score | 939616 | 2152184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 51.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 92 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 15478 |
| Writing score | n/a | 23039 |
| Web score | n/a | 11895 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5599 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 12384 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14116 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS (Upgradeable to HarmonyOS 4.2) | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| UI Skin | n/a | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5050 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 0:31 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:38 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:53 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:25 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 94 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12.5 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.4 - 4.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV50H | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.3 | 1/0.98 |
| Pixel size | 1.2 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 93 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 125 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 81 |
| Zoom | n/a | 155 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 20 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes DP 1.2 | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 (850/900/1800/1900 MHz) | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B6/B7/B8/B9/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1300 | 800 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes 100 W |
Note
Huawei Pura 70 Pro:
There is a smartphone model that supports only one physical SIM card and eSIM.
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
