Huawei Pura 80 Pro vs Honor X7d
Compared 2 smartphones : Huawei Pura 80 Pro Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetHiSilicon Kirin 9020, vs Honor X7d, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Huawei Pura 80 Pro
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 459ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Honor X7d
- Lighter design: 208g vs 219g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5700mAh
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 12/1024 GB |
- 12/128 GB - 16/128 GB - 16/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1276x2848 pixels | 1610x720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 459 ppi | 261 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 86.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163 mm (6.42 in) | 166.8 mm (6.57 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 76.8 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 219 g (7.72 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP65 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Brown |
- Black - Silver - Gold - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 9020 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.6 (Taishan-Little) - 3/2.15 (TaiShan V120) - 1/2.5 (TaiShan V121) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Da Vinci | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1638 | 465 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5141 | 1468 |
| CPU | 371982 | 108352 |
| GPU | 286732 | 38159 |
| Memory | 319042 | 114138 |
| UX | 218993 | 72107 |
| NanoReview Score | 1196749 | 332756 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Software
| OS | HarmonyOS (Upgradeable to HarmonyOS 5.1) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | n/a | MagicOS 9.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5700 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 35 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (80 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 42 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:20 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12000x9000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 4x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | n/a | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 40 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 - 4.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 48 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | n/a |
| Focal length | 93 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 40 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 13 mm | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | n/a |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | June, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 900 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes, 35 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Huawei Pura 80 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0