Infinix GT 20 Pro vs Realme C51
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix GT 20 Pro Manufactured in April, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, vs Realme C51, Manufactured in August, 2023 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 20 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 388ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Realme C51
- Lighter design: 186g vs 194g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.74 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 388 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 560 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91 % | 85.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.26 mm (6.47 in) | 167.2 mm (6.58 in) |
| Width | 75.43 mm (2.97 in) | 76.7 mm (3.02 in) |
| Thickness | 8.15 mm (0.32 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Silver - Blue - Orange |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
| Max Frequency | 3100 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex A55) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) |
- 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 580 | n/a |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 614 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1442 GFLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1248 | 415 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3672 | 1476 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 4532 | n/a |
| CPU | 251776 | 85532 |
| GPU | 241174 | 23310 |
| Memory | 206806 | 66023 |
| UX | 234618 | 69972 |
| NanoReview Score | 934374 | 244837 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14 | Realme UI T |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (73% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 28 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:01 h | 1:12 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 30 fps (480p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung HM6 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 28 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5K5E9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1440p at 30 fps | 720p at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2/B3/B5/B8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA (B1/B2/B4/B5/B8) | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | July, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2024 yr | August, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 350 | 160 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 20 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0