Infinix GT 30 5G vs Xiaomi Poco C71
66
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix GT 30 5G Manufactured in August, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400, vs Xiaomi Poco C71, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 30 5G
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 187g vs 193g
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco C71
- Larger display: 6.88in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 85.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) | 171.79 mm (6.76 in) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Blue - Green |
- Black - Gold - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1061 | 437 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3185 | 1438 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 3069 | 708 |
| CPU | 229449 | 92232 |
| GPU | 182126 | 30830 |
| Memory | 142414 | 78630 |
| UX | 184370 | 78630 |
| NanoReview Score | 738359 | 270293 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (24% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 2:32 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 32 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 111 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B3/B5/B8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B0/B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B28/B38/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | August, 2025 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 200 | 70 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 30 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
