Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Realme C85 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix GT 30 Pro Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Realme C85 4G, Manufactured in January, 2026with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 685. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Lighter design: 189g vs 215g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Realme C85 4G
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5200mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 pixels | 720x1570 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 87.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) | 166.2 mm (6.54 in) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) | 77.9 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/1.9 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.8 (Cortex-A73) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1260 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 322.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | n/a | 480 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | n/a | 1514 |
| CPU | 490613 | 144708 |
| GPU | 500467 | 20888 |
| Memory | 344355 | 128828 |
| UX | 421755 | 106958 |
| NanoReview Score | 1757190 | 401382 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | Realme UI 6.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 111 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 28 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.96 (0.34) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B13/B20/B26/B28/B38/B40/B41/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 310 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0