Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus

Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix GT 30 Pro Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 30 Pro
  • Lighter design: 189g vs 212g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5200mAh

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1224x2720 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 440 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max brightness 1600 nits 2000 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 89.5 % 89.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 163.7 mm (6.44 in) 163.7 mm (6.44 in)
Width 75.8 mm (2.98 in) 75.9 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 189 g (6.67 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Water resistance IP64 IP65
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- White
- Gold
- Gray
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Infinix GT 30 Pro
89.5 %
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
89.3 %

Performance

Testing Infinix GT 30 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
Max Frequency 3350 MHz 3730 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715)
- 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715)
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4)
- 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 780 MediaTek NPU 890
Graphics Mali-G615 MP6 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
GPU Cores 768 1536
GPU Frequency 1400 MHz 1612 MHz
FLOPS 2150.4 GFLOPS 4952.1 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Infinix GT 30 Pro
n/a
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
2816
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Infinix GT 30 Pro
n/a
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
8686
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)n/a2816
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)n/a8686
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a21322
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Infinix GT 30 Pro
1757190
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus
2701004
CPU490613632892
GPU5004671177786
Memory344355405582
UX421755484744
NanoReview Score17571902701004

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5333 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory Cardn/aNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin XOS 15 OriginOS 5

Battery

Volume 5200 mAh 8000 mAh
Max Charging Power 45 W 90 W
Battery Type n/a Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable Yes No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes (Wireless) Yes
Fast Charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 108 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 12000x9000 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Wide-angle lens 111 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 108 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix108 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.9f/1.8
Sensorn/aSony LYT-600
Sensor sizen/a1/2
Pixel sizen/a0.8 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 13 MP 16 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Sensor size n/a 1/3.0
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM B2|3|5|8n/a
3G BandsWCDMA B1|2|4|5|8n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66)n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio Yes No

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced May, 2025 yr August, 2025 yr
Release Date June, 2025 yr August, 2025 yr
MSRP ($) 310 320
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 45 W Yes, 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
1 (33.33%)
2 (66.67%)
Total Votes: 3

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below