Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
76
out 100
VS
60
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix GT 30 Pro Manufactured in June, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 30 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 189g vs 232g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 5200mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 440 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 825 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 86.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) | 170.12 mm (6.7 in) |
| Width | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) | 78.42 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 232 g (8.18 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | n/a | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black |
- Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | n/a | 973 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | n/a | 2241 |
| CPU | 490613 | 252111 |
| GPU | 500467 | 36217 |
| Memory | 344355 | 148946 |
| UX | 421755 | 182499 |
| NanoReview Score | 1757190 | 619773 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | n/a | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12000x9000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 111 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.1 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2025 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 310 | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 30 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
