Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC vs Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
44
out 100
VS
57
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.82 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G37, vs Samsung Galaxy A07 5G, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 30 Play NFC
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 263ppi
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A07 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 199g vs 205g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 720x1640 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 262 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 83.6 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 170.57 mm (6.72 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 77.5 mm (3.05 in) | 77.4 mm (3.05 in) |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Purple |
- Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G37 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 137.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 197 | 780 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 881 | 2029 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 34 | n/a |
| CPU | 54012 | 211271 |
| GPU | 18177 | 47261 |
| Memory | 40689 | 137022 |
| UX | 41802 | 168024 |
| NanoReview Score | 154680 | 563578 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | XOS 12.6 | One UI 8.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (78% in 120 min) | Yes (37% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 4:00 h | 1:45 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 16 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2023 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 125 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy A07 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
