Infinix Hot 30i vs Oppo A5 Pro 5G
45
out 100
VS
61
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Hot 30i Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 6.56 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Oppo A5 Pro 5G, Manufactured in March, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 30i
- Higher pixel density: 269ppi
- Lighter design: 191g vs 194g
Reasons to choose Oppo A5 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5800mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.56 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 720x1604 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.6 % | 86.3 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 164 mm (6.46 in) | 164.82 mm (6.49 in) |
| Width | 75.75 mm (2.98 in) | 75.53 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 7.76 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Blue |
Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 274 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 376 | 790 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1315 | 2010 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1420 |
| CPU | 80363 | 137518 |
| GPU | 23190 | 63802 |
| Memory | 79761 | 110644 |
| UX | 62883 | 113712 |
| NanoReview Score | 246197 | 425676 |
| Writing score | 8425 | n/a |
| Web score | 7583 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4249 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5297 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7029 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 10.6 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5800 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 80 min) | Yes (50% in 35 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:40 h | 1:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | 120 fps (720p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1234578202828B3841) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | February, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2023 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 110 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo A5 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
