Infinix Hot 40i vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
47
out 100
VS
67
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Hot 40i Manufactured in December, 2023, with display 6.56 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Vivo iQOO Z11x, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediatek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Hot 40i
- Lighter design: 190g vs 219g
Reasons to choose Vivo iQOO Z11x
- Larger display: 6.76in
- Higher pixel density: 382ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7200mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.56 in | 6.76 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2344 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 382 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 480 nits | 1200 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84 % | 85.9 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) | 166.6 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 78.4 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| Water resistance | n/a | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue - Green |
- Black - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 370 | 1064 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1394 | 2878 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3062 |
| CPU | 80372 | 329972 |
| GPU | 23332 | 147724 |
| Memory | 101820 | 155228 |
| UX | 63142 | 289303 |
| NanoReview Score | 268666 | 922227 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | XOS 13.5 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 44 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 43 min) |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4208x3120 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.93 (0.34) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | December, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2023 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 120 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 0 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo iQOO Z11x the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
