Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G vs Google Pixel 11
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G Manufactured in March, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, vs Google Pixel 11, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G6. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 50 Pro 4G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 4985mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 11
- Higher pixel density: 422ppi
- Lighter design: 197g vs 198g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.3 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1080x2424 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 422 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4 % | 87.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) | 152.8 mm (6.02 in) |
| Width | 74.4 mm (2.93 in) | 72 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm (0.29 in) | 8.6 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Black - Green - Red - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | Google Tensor G6 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4110 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 7 (1 + 4 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 2/2.65 () - 4/3.38 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 128 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 725 | 2575 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2012 | 6027 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1473 | n/a |
| CPU | 139279 | 848037 |
| GPU | 69636 | 271374 |
| Memory | 115564 | 297105 |
| UX | 109755 | 455981 |
| NanoReview Score | 434234 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | Stock Android |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 4985 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 90 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (30 W) | Yes (25 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 19 min) | Yes (46% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:38 h | 1:38 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 2 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 10.8 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/1.57 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 108 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/3.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 112 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.2 (0.31) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.31 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 2 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX712 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.32 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 105 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3648x2736 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 20 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.65 (0.38) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|5|8 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2025 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 200 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 90 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Google Pixel 11 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0