Infinix Note 30i vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 30i Manufactured in June, 2023, with display 6.66 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro, Manufactured in June, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Super. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 30i
- Lighter design: 198g vs 213g
Reasons to choose OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.66 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1272x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.6:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1400 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 89.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.49 mm (6.48 in) | 162.6 mm (6.4 in) |
| Width | 76.72 mm (3.02 in) | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8.18 mm (0.32 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Green |
- Gray - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Super |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 48 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 423 | 1055 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1478 | 3177 |
| CPU | 85021 | 445015 |
| GPU | 35662 | 193175 |
| Memory | 68860 | 215728 |
| UX | 75280 | 291595 |
| NanoReview Score | 264823 | 1098457 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | n/a |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14 | OxygenOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (95% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:40 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B40 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 16 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4608x3456 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM (850/900/1800/1900) | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100) | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2023 yr | June, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 295 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Turbo 6X Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0