Infinix Note 30i vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
46
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 30i Manufactured in June, 2023, with display 6.66 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G85, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17, Manufactured in July, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 30i
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Lighter design: 198g vs 225g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5.1
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 17
- Larger display: 7in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.66 in | 7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2396 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 375 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.49 mm (6.48 in) | 169.7 mm (6.68 in) |
| Width | 76.72 mm (3.02 in) | 79.14 mm (3.12 in) |
| Thickness | 8.18 mm (0.32 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP53 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.3 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 48 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 423 | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1478 | 2178 |
| CPU | 85021 | 273209 |
| GPU | 35662 | 56148 |
| Memory | 68860 | 114369 |
| UX | 75280 | 150123 |
| NanoReview Score | 264823 | 593849 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14 | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (95% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:40 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B40 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV08F |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM (850/900/1800/1900) | GSM850/GSM900/GSM1800 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA (850/900/1900/2100) | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | July, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2023 yr | July, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 170 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
