Infinix Note 40 Pro vs Tecno Spark 8C
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 40 Pro Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate, vs Tecno Spark 8C, Manufactured in February, 2022 with chipsetUnisoc T606. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 40 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 190g vs 193g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 8C
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1612 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.9 % | 84.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) | 164.57 mm (6.48 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 76 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 7.75 mm (0.31 in) | 8.95 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IPX2 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gold - Green |
- Black - Gray - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate | Unisoc T606 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 727 | 499 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2010 | 1540 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1471 | n/a |
| CPU | 131122 | 78764 |
| GPU | 71195 | 22204 |
| Memory | 106312 | 59509 |
| UX | 116430 | 64021 |
| NanoReview Score | 425059 | 224498 |
| Stability | n/a | 98 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 396 |
| Writing score | n/a | 7592 |
| Web score | n/a | 6908 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4874 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6030 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 7467 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14 | HiOS 7.6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 70 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (20 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 20 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 0:41 h | 2:50 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung SK5HM2SP03 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.67 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | GalaxyCore GC32E1 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - Beidou |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | n/a |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 1800 / 1900 / 850 / 900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|5|8 | UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1358384041) | LTE (B3)/B40)/B1800(/B2300() |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | January, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 250 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 70 W | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Note 40 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0