Infinix Note 40 vs Infinix GT 30 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 40 Manufactured in March, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate, vs Infinix GT 30 5G, Manufactured in August, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 40
Reasons to choose Infinix GT 30 5G
- Higher pixel density: 440ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 187g vs 190g
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1224x2720 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 440 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.7 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.13 mm (6.46 in) | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 74.53 mm (2.93 in) | 75.8 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.75 mm (0.31 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 190 g (6.7 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP54 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold |
- White - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 745 | 1061 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2024 | 3185 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 3069 |
| CPU | 136181 | 229449 |
| GPU | 70093 | 182126 |
| Memory | 113366 | 142414 |
| UX | 110409 | 184370 |
| NanoReview Score | 430049 | 738359 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 14 | XOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | Yes |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (20 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 26 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 0:57 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 111 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|5|8 | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1358384041) | LTE (B0/B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B28/B38/B41) |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2024 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 190 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 200 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix GT 30 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0