Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 1
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Tecno Spark Go 1, Manufactured in August, 2024 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T615. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 1
- Lighter design: 185g vs 209g
Versions
| Memory Options | 12/256 GB | - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.36 mm (6.43 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 74.53 mm (2.93 in) | 77.01 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 8.35 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP54 |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Purple |
- White - Black |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Unisoc Tiger T615 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 108.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1216 | 441 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3896 | 1454 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 596 |
| CPU | 280856 | 88108 |
| GPU | 562288 | 30185 |
| Memory | 343443 | 73422 |
| UX | 253867 | 66427 |
| NanoReview Score | 1440454 | 258142 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | HIOS 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 14 min) | Yes (49% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:32 h | 1:55 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Focal length | 70 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | n/a |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | August, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | August, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 390 | 90 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0