Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G vs Vivo X100 Pro
76
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, vs Vivo X100 Pro, Manufactured in November, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 50 Pro Plus 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 209g vs 225g
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5200mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | 12/256 GB | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 369 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.36 mm (6.43 in) | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 74.53 mm (2.93 in) | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1216 | 2231 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3896 | 7526 |
| CPU | 280856 | 490601 |
| GPU | 562288 | 893392 |
| Memory | 343443 | 446780 |
| UX | 253867 | 321411 |
| NanoReview Score | 1440454 | 2152184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 51.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 92 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 15478 |
| Writing score | n/a | 23039 |
| Web score | n/a | 11895 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5599 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 12384 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14116 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | Yes | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 14 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:32 h | 0:31 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 09:38 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 14:53 h |
| Games | n/a | 06:25 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 94 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/0.98 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 81 |
| Zoom | n/a | 155 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 20 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 390 | 800 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | Yes 100 W |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
