Infinix Note 50x 5G vs Motorola Moto G86 5G
56
out 100
VS
69
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 50x 5G Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, vs Motorola Moto G86 5G, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 50x 5G
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5200mAh
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G86 5G
- Higher pixel density: 446ppi
- Lighter design: 185g vs 195.4g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | n/a | Yes |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 1500 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.4 mm (6.51 in) | 161.21 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 76.4 mm (3.01 in) | 74.74 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 7.87 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 195.4 g (6.89 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Pink - Purple |
- Black - Gold - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1047 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1001 | 1031 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2718 | 3042 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2493 | n/a |
| CPU | 211988 | 209375 |
| GPU | 141199 | 147341 |
| Memory | 131016 | 165692 |
| UX | 136145 | 178017 |
| NanoReview Score | 620348 | 700425 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | XOS 15 | Hello UI |
Battery
| Volume | 5500 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:12 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 118 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3280x2460 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | March, 2025 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 135 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 339 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G86 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
